‘Change and decay in all around I see’, as Evelyn Waugh’s Uncle Theodore cheerfully sang (‘Old Lang Syne’); or, to cite another famous author, ‘all that moueth, doth in Change delight’. This editorial marks our last issue of The Spenser Review.
There are, of course, reasons to be cheerful. As was recently announced on twitter (https://twitter.com/SpenserSociety/status/1578130524664725522?s=20&t=tfc94B5QfvWIBSKmNGduFg)[1] the Review will now be overseen by the editors of Spenser Studies – Susannah Monta, Bill Oram, and Ayesha Ramachandran – bringing the Review more closely under the umbrella of the International Spenser Society. They will be looking for guest editors to produce the three annual issues of the journal so please do send them your proposals. The reviews section – edited by Tamsin Badcoe – and the news items will continue as before.
We feel that we are leaving on a high as this is a very full issue with a collection of excellent pieces. We have several reflections on the origin, history, and significance of the Review by past editors and review editors, which seems timely at this turning point in the history of the journal, charting its change from a newsletter to an on-line publication. We are grateful to a number of past editors for responding to our invitation: in addition to those included here, we would also like to thank Craig Berry, Terry Krier, and Beth Quitsland for replying to our request. We have a series of reflections on one of the towering figures in Spenser – and Renaissance – studies, Judith Anderson, who, as you will all know, died recently. Judith was a very important figure for all of us, producing a series of major works over a long period; engaging in robust and critical debate with her peers; mentoring younger scholars; and supporting numerous events throughout the world. She will be missed by those who knew her personally and those who encountered her on the page.
The issue also contains three critical reflections and the series of interventions that were delivered at the revised ‘MacLean Event’ on ‘Spenser and Performance in 2021.’ This revisited the 2017 ISS experiment at Shakespeare’s Globe, London. Here we find extensive multi-media thoughts on transferring Spenser from one medium to another, forming its own mini-archive from Kat Addis, Jeff Dolven and Leah Whittington, Adam Smyth, and Leah Veronese, all collected, edited, and introduced by Will West. This issue also features Ayesha Ramachandran’s timely reflections on the ‘global turn’ in Spenser and Renaissance studies, which has done so much to broaden horizons but has also – perhaps – come at the expense of the ‘local’. It may well be time to take stock and reflect on what sort of scholarship we would like to see sustaining us into the future. However we think of our subject we would surely welcome the two other pieces included here. Ladan Niayesh continues her reflections on the relationship between English literature and Persia, here contributing a thoughtful piece on Spenser’s particular representation of the mitre and how it cuts (at least) two ways for Spenser. In her essay Laetitia Sansonetti argues that we should pay more attention to the ways in which different languages force us to think about the world through their gendering of grammatical agreements, turning, of course, to translations of Spenser. In each of these pieces, more versions of Spenser appear for us to contend with in years to come.
Finally, there is a large quotient of ten reviews, the work of our excellent reviews editor, Tamsin Badcoe, whose labours will continue after we have gone. We would also like to thank Tom Kowalczyk, who has been a splendid assistant editor, and it has been a great pleasure for us to work with him; Katie Mishler, too, was a huge help in the first years of our term. We look forward to reading the Review as much as we have enjoyed editing it.
Jane Grogan and Andrew Hadfield
52.3.1
Comments
It may well be time to take stock and reflect on what sort of scholarship we would like to see sustaining us into the future.
Link / ReplyI'm so glad I stumbled upon this blog, it's a gem.
Link / ReplyIt may well be time to take stock and reflect on what sort of scholarship we would like to see sustaining us into the future.
Link / ReplyThis is a pretty complete issue with a variety of fantastic pieces, so we feel like we are departing on a high note.
Link / ReplyIt might be time to evaluate our situation and think about the kind of scholarship we want to see sustaining us in the future.
Link / ReplyThe reviews section – edited by Tamsin Badcoe – and the news items will continue as before.
Link / ReplyIt may well be time to take stock and reflect on what sort of scholarship we would like to see sustaining us into the future.
Link / ReplyThey will be looking for guest editors to produce the three annual issues of the journal so please do send them your proposals.
Link / ReplyThe "global turn" in Spenser and Renaissance studies, which has greatly expanded horizons but may have also harmed the "local," is also discussed in this issue by Ayesha Ramachandran in her relevant insights.
Link / ReplyAlong with three critical reflections, the issue includes a number of the interventions made during the updated "MacLean Event" on "Spenser and Performance in 2021."
Link / ReplyYour blog provided us with valuable information. I am looking forward to read more blog posts from here keep it up!!
Link / ReplyThis revisited the 2017 ISS experiment at Shakespeare’s Globe, London.
Link / ReplyThanks for sharing this one. This is so helpful!
Link / ReplyIt may well be time to take stock and reflect on what sort of scholarship we would like to see sustaining us into the future.
Link / ReplyIt appears that you've shared an excerpt from an editorial discussing the final issue of The Spenser Review. The editorial reflects on the history and significance of the journal, noting its transition from a newsletter to an online publication. The piece mentions the change in editorial oversight, with the journal now being overseen by the editors of Spenser Studies.
Link / ReplyThe passing of Judith Anderson is a great loss to the Spenserian and Renaissance studies communities. She was a towering figure in the field, known for her groundbreaking work on Edmund Spenser, her robust and critical engagement with her peers, her mentorship of younger scholars, and her support of numerous events throughout the world.
Link / ReplyThe editorial reflects on the final issue of The Spenser Review, marking the end of an era for the journal. The editorial notes that the journal will now be overseen by the editors of Spenser Studies, bringing it more closely under the umbrella of the International Spenser Society. The editorial expresses gratitude to past editors and review editors who provided reflections on the origin, history, and significance of the Review.
Link / ReplyThis editorial marks the final issue of The Spenser Review, reflecting on the journal's history and announcing changes in its oversight. The editors express gratitude for the contributions and support received over the years.
Link / ReplyAs you are all aware, Judith Anderson was a towering figure in Spenser and Renaissance studies, and today we have a series of reflections on her.
Link / ReplyI read this post your post so nice and very informative post thanks for sharing this post.
Link / ReplyThe quote from Evelyn Waugh's novel "Decline and Fall" serves as a fitting prelude to the closing of The Spenser Review. It speaks to the inevitability of change and the ephemeral nature of all things, including literary publications. Just as the characters in Waugh's novel grapple with the passing of an era, we too must acknowledge the end of this particular chapter in the world of literary criticism.
Link / ReplyWe are grateful to a number of past editors for responding to our invitation:
Link / ReplyRemember, the key is to strike a balance between acknowledging the end and celebrating the journey. Use the quotes as springboards to evoke both melancholy and reflection, while leaving a positive and memorable final impression on your readers.
Link / ReplyShe will be missed by those who knew her personally and those who encountered her on the page.
Link / ReplyShe will be missed by those who knew her personally and those who encountered her on the page.
Link / ReplyThanks for sharing this item. This is so useful!
Link / ReplyHere we find extensive multi-media thoughts on transferring Spenser from one medium to another.
Link / ReplyThanks for this great share.
Link / ReplyThis editorial marks the final issue of The Spenser Review, a moment of change and transition for the publication. However, there are reasons to be optimistic about the future, as the journal will now be overseen by the editors of Spenser Studies, bringing it closer to the International Spenser Society. The new editorial team will be seeking guest editors to produce the three annual issues of the journal, continuing the tradition of scholarly excellence.
Link / ReplyCongratulations on a successful tenure and best wishes to the new editorial team. The Spenser Review has undoubtedly left a lasting impact on Spenserian scholarship.
Link / ReplyLooks like the review will be missed dearly. Testament to your work!
Link / ReplyGreat post! Would love to see more posts from this site.
Link / ReplyThanks for the content you shared!
Link / ReplyThanks for the content.
Link / ReplyI'm glad to see this interesting content on this site.
Link / ReplyYou must log in to comment.