Please consider registering as a member of the International Spenser Society, the professional organization that supports The Spenser Review. There is no charge for membership; your contact information will be kept strictly confidential and will be used only to conduct the business of the ISS—chiefly to notify members when a new issue of SpR has been posted.

Alice Leonard, Shakespeare in Error: Error in Shakespeare
by Joseph Gamble

Alice Leonard, Shakespeare in Error: Error in Shakespeare. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. 197 pp. ISBN: 9783030351793. £64.99 hardback.

 

In Shakespeare in Error: Error in Shakespeare, Alice Leonard valorises the concept of ‘error’ as both a potential virtue – a productive form of ‘wandering’, to draw on the etymological root of the word – and as a methodological entry point into early modern thought processes. ‘Error’, she writes, ‘exposes what the world takes for granted, revealing something of the political unconscious of a moment, how a society orders the world according to right and wrong, and assigns or withholds equivalent value’ (3). Rather than correct errors, then, Leonard argues that we should see errors as constitutive of the texts and cultures at hand, as vital components of early modern thought and literary practice. Despite its title, the book ranges beyond the Shakespearean corpus into plays by Jonson and Marston (and, especially relevant to readers of The Spenser Review, even into a short reading of Spenser’s Errour), but Leonard ultimately attempts to persuade her reader that error is particularly present and vital in Shakespeare’s early comedies and history plays, which are her primary objects of analysis. Though she argues that ‘in comedy [error] is casual and in tragedy it is causal’ (6, emphasis hers), she cautions that we should nevertheless not assume that error in Shakespeare’s comedies is ‘frivolous’ and should instead approach it as a ‘political topic for examination’ (6).

‘Error’ in this book has an extremely capacious reach, and each of the chapters takes up a different facet of error in various early modern texts. Chapter Two focuses on figurative language, analysing in particular how early modern rhetoricians understood figuration as a form of necessary and productive (if also potentially dangerous) error. Reading Jonson’s Poetaster and A Tale of A Tub, Leonard convincingly demonstrates that Jonson attempts to castigate error, whereas Shakespeare – as she argues in readings of Love’s Labours Lost, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and both 1 and 2 Henry IV – ‘exploit[s] the dramatic spectacle of indecorum’, and celebrates the poetic productivity of error (59). Chapter Three focuses on the gendering of error, and particularly on the concept of the ‘mother tongue’. Offering readings of The Merry Wives of Windsor, Romeo and Juliet, the various parts of Henry VI, and, briefly, Book I of The Faerie Queene, Leonard argues that early modern women’s speech was seen as inherently imbued with error, even as the notion of the ‘mother tongue’ installed gender into the nationalisation of language. This chapter most surprises when it juxtaposes Queen Margaret from Shakespeare’s Henry VI plays with Spenser’s Errour, who, Leonard argues ‘appears as a character as a fantastical mother tongue’ (103). Though readers of The Spenser Review may wish for Leonard to have expanded on her very brief reading of Spenser (which fills only slightly less than three pages in a book of nearly two hundred), they will surely find the comparisons between Spenser and Shakespeare illuminating.

Chapter Four focuses on the association of errors in speech with the encroachment of non-English words into the English language and onto the English stage. Here Leonard pays special attention to Franceschina in Marston’s The Dutch Courtesan and Katherine in Henry V, two ‘foreign’ characters who make errors in their English speech. Leonard argues that Shakespeare’s treatment of Katherine’s linguistic errors is gentler than Marston’s condemnation of Franceschina, and thus that Shakespeare’s play is more in-line with a pluralistic view of early modern language, one that allows for the productive potential of incorporating foreign languages into English. Shakespeare thus, in her view, ‘plays with the dubious characterisation of foreignness as wrongness, using error to challenge an idea of national identity stabilised through linguistic homogeneity’ (118). Though I was excited to see a somewhat surprising juxtaposition of The Dutch Courtesan and Henry V, I found the capaciousness of Leonard’s conception of ‘error’ to be slightly more obfuscatory than illuminating in this chapter, since the focus on linguistic error in these plays took precedence over analyses of class and genre, which might well account for the differing treatment of these two characters – one a sex worker in a city comedy, one a princess in a history play.

Finally, Chapter Five analyses an inescapable text for a book on Shakespearean error: The Comedy of Errors. Here Leonard turns most explicitly to the book historical, returning to bibliographic and editorial debates about the various confusions around speech tags in early editions of the play in order to claim that such confusions are not faults or defects, but constitutive and productive elements of the play’s own investment in confusion. Tackling ‘error’ in a more restrictive sense, this is, in my estimation, the book’s best chapter, and though book historians and editors may be well-versed in the bibliographic ground that Leonard treads here, I think most readers will learn much from Leonard’s discussions of the play’s early printing, and of early modern and modern readers’, performers’, and editors’ attempts to make sense of the play’s textual ‘errors’. I certainly did.

 Shakespeare in Error is a well-researched study of the capacity of language to wander astray in early modern drama and culture more broadly. In our own moment of misinformation and mistake – our own ‘culture of error’, as Adam Smyth calls early modernity in his preface to this book (ix) – Leonard’s turn to error feels timely. This book will surely be of interest to scholars of early modern rhetoric and language, and to anyone who has ever made an error.

 

Joseph Gamble

 

Comments

  • slime rancher 2 1 year, 5 months ago

    Nice information, valuable and excellent design, as share good stuff with good ideas and concepts, lots of great information and inspiration, both of which I need, thanks to offer such a helpful information here.

    Link / Reply
    • basketball stars 1 month, 4 weeks ago

      Players of any age will find the game to be incredibly interesting and amusing due to the fact that it features hard stages, a broad range of candy, and the requirement of strategic thinking in order to obtain high scores during the game.

      Link / Reply
  • Beverly Smothers 1 year, 2 months ago

    I adore Shakespeare and his masterpieces. Besides his plays, I read novels and dramas. If you are a bookworm like me, then start with options like the book "Far from the Madding Crowd" by Thomas Hardy. I read it when I was back in school once, and it was like a reminder that passion and beauty can appear even in unexpected places because it's everywhere, even in the hearts of the roughest people. Additionally, https://freebooksummary.com/category/far-from-the-madding-crowd is an excellent alternative to help kids and not only understand the idea of art and literature in art. After checking out the free book summary of the mentioned novel, I deeply realized the subject and the message.

    Link / Reply
  • gorilla tag 9 months ago

    I am very enjoyed this blog. It's an informative topic. It helps me very much to solve some problems.

    Link / Reply
  • pressure washing pros 6 months ago

    Scholars of early modern rhetoric and language, as well as everyone who has ever made a mistake, will undoubtedly find this book interesting.

    Link / Reply
  • geometry dash online 5 days, 19 hours ago

    Instead of the then-clause, which briefly opens an other future, the simple announcement of the name enters like a death sentence.

    Link / Reply

You must log in to comment.

52.1.8

Cite as:

Joseph Gamble, "Alice Leonard, Shakespeare in Error: Error in Shakespeare," Spenser Review 52.1.8 (Winter 2022). Accessed April 17th, 2024.
Not logged in or