The current issue of The Spenser Review reminds us all in the Spenser community of our debt to tradition. We have to pay our last respects to Tom Roche, who sadly died this May. Tom, as you all know, wrote one of the critical works that has shaped modern Spenser criticism, The Kindly Flame (1964), as well as co-founding and steering the course of Spenser Studies from 1980 onwards. We have asked two major Spenserians, Roger Kuin and Anne Lake Prescott, who knew Tom well, to reflect on his significance and influence, as well as providing personal reflections. This volume also marks a rather more celebratory event, the publication of Harry Berger Jr.’s Resisting Allegory, organized by the previous editor of the Review, David Lee Miller (who also edited Resisting Allegory; a review will appear in our next issue). The online symposium contains a series of reflections by critics and scholars of different generations explaining how they understand the work of another major Spenserian and the role it played in their own critical thinking and intellectual development. As with the tributes to Tom Roche, the discussion is a combination of intellectual exploration and personal reflection in a variety of modes and styles.
The issue also contains Bill Oram’s Hugh MacLean lecture on the Amoretti and Epithalamion, an important intervention that argues that while the sonnet sequence should be understood as a dialogue, the marriage-hymn reverts to the dominant male voice, even though the poet always understands that poetry should provoke and challenge. We have published Willy Maley’s extensive response to Jean Brink’s important new book on Spenser’s life before he moved to Ireland as a feature, appropriately enough for a serious discussion by the author of the Spenser Chronology (1994), one of the key works that has helped us reconstruct Spenser’s biography. And as usual, our review section takes on major critical works of interest to Spenserians and other scholars of early modern literature.
Hoping this finds you all safe and well.
Jane Grogan and Andrew Hadfield
50.2.1
Comments
We have to pay our last respects to Tom Roche, who sadly died this May.
Link / ReplyAs with the tributes to Tom Roche, the discussion is a combination of intellectual exploration and personal reflection in a variety of modes and styles.
Link / ReplyStruggling to meet an essay deadline, I decided to try https://paperwriter.com/essay-for-sale, and it was a fantastic choice. The essay I received was expertly written, covering all the key points and meeting all my requirements. The quality of the work far exceeded what I could have done on my own, and the timely delivery was a huge relief. The process was seamless, with clear communication throughout.
Link / ReplyI enjoyed the variety of perspectives presented in this post. It adds depth to the discussion on topic.
Link / ReplyThis Spenser Review issue honors tradition, remembering Tom Roche, whose work shaped Spenser criticism. Reflect on his influence alongside celebrations for Harry Berger Jr.'s Resisting Allegory. Bill Oram analyzes Amoretti and Epithalamion, while Willy Maley responds to Jean Brink's book on Spenser's life. It’s a complex tapestry, not unlike the strategic thinking you need to master in the game Block Blast. Enjoy exploring these intellectual blocks! The review section offers insights, hoping all are safe and well.
Link / ReplyYou must log in to comment.