Lady Macbeth, rubbing her hands (5.1.16-26) #DaggerDrawn #SlowShakespeare

Enter Lady, with a taper

GENTLEWOMAN       Lo you, here she comes. This is her very guise, and, upon my life, fast asleep. Observe her. Stand close.

DOCTOR         How came she by that light?

GENTLEWOMAN       Why, it stood by her. She has light by her continually; ’tis her command.

DOCTOR         You see her eyes are open.

GENTLEWOMAN       Ay, but their sense are shut.

DOCTOR         What is it she does now? Look how she rubs her hands.

GENTLEWOMAN       It is an accustomed action with her to seem thus washing her hands. I have known her continue in this a quarter of an hour.          (5.1.16-26)

 

So here she is, Lady Macbeth, in her nightgown (however that’s being interpreted by a production: drapery, nightie, pyjamas, negligee, naked). And with a taper, a candle in her hand: an early modern audience might make a visual connection to those doing formal penance at Paul’s Cross, wrapped in a sheet or smock, carrying a lighted taper. What she’s wearing and carrying already signify guilt, and the desire to atone. This is her very guise, says the Gentlewoman, this is what I’ve been telling you, trying to make you understand—and, upon my life, fast asleep. Observe her. Stand close; let’s conceal ourselves, so that we can watch and listen. The Doctor is thinking about the practicalities: how came she by that light? surely not safe, for a sleepwalking woman to be carrying a lighted candle, to have ready access to a naked flame. It’s familiar and obvious to the Gentlewoman, and she hasn’t questioned it: it stood by her, presumably next to her bed. She has light by her continually; ’tis her command. Lady Macbeth insists on having a candle with her all the time. Lady Macbeth, it seems, is afraid of the dark.

 

The Doctor’s still making his mansplainy observations: you see her eyes are open. (This is not news to the Gentlewoman; she told him that this was the case.) The point is, their sense are shut. Her eyes are open but she can’t see; she is, in effect, blind, unseeing, uncomprehending, not aware of her surroundings. Then another action, that the Doctor can’t at first interpret: what is it she does now? look how she rubs her hands. Implicit stage direction for the actor playing Lady Macbeth, and she will, perhaps, need to set down the light in order to do so, suggesting that it’s in a candlestick. She rubs her hands together intently and purposefully, and this too is familiar to the Gentlewoman: it is an accustomed action with her to seem thus washing her hands. It’s the Gentlewoman who is able to interpret this as washing; the Doctor simply sees rubbing, but the Gentlewoman knows what’s going on, it’s washing, because she’s heard the words that are going to accompany this action already, the words which she has thus far been too afraid to repeat to the Doctor. I have known her continue in this a quarter of an hour. A good length of time to imagine, far too long to be reasonable, short enough still to be imaginable, which it wouldn’t be if it were an hour, say. A length of time that allows the audience to imagine the discomfort, even pain of that repeated action, rubbing, washing, staring, agonising.

View 4 comments on “Lady Macbeth, rubbing her hands (5.1.16-26) #DaggerDrawn #SlowShakespeare

  1. This has been a really exciting and indulging analysis of Macbeth, and far exceeds what I could do myself. Thank you so much, Hester! My question surrounds the theme of guilt in this scene and others. Do Lady Macbeth really feel guilty and remorseful for what they (Macbeth and Lady Macbeth) had done in a sense that they had done wrong, or is she more inflicted by the unideal consequences of their actions? In other words, can it also be a sign that they could not escape the influence of Christian ideologies and the ruling of God however evil they are and however deeply related they are with supernatural beings? Which in turn, implies a main purpose of Shakespeare’s writing the play, to show the righteousness of having the current king (King James I) who is appointed by God?
    Also I guess, a second interpretation can be that it shows Lady Macbeth’s unprecedented feminine characters as being weak and quite cowardly (sorry I don’t have better adjectives) ( very stereotypical and very misogynistic I know) or even in general, human characteristics. This might add to the effects that supernatural beings could’ve had on her, showing the influence they have over Lady Macbeth to make her so cruel – we never knew what Lady Macbeth was like before the timeline of the play.
    Apologies ahead for bothering you with some rubbish interpretations.

    1. I’m glad you’ve found this interesting! I think I’d always want to avoid reducing interpretation to a single ‘purpose’ for Shakespeare – especially as the text as we have it could well be some way away from Shakespeare’s own early C17 text… He was writing above all to entertain, to make money; he couldn’t afford to have a single political ‘purpose’ in his writing! As for Lady M ‘feeling’ guilt – that’s certainly a choice that an actor can make – but (for all the psychological appeal of these characters!) they’re not people… you’re absolutely right that we can’t know what she was like before the play – because she didn’t exist. (An actor can develop a back-story, of course!) I suppose I’m more interested in local effects of language, in the moment? but you’re right to see the strong connections between Lady M and the witches – which I’d want to locate in a shared language, a kind of atmosphere or energy – rather than an influence? (sorry, that probably doesn’t make sense). But I’m so pleased you’ve found this interesting and enjoyable!

  2. Just reading this blog again as I prepare to teach Macbeth (and definitely reduce it to a single purpose for the sake of the GCSE…shame on me!) and wanted to say how wonderfully pleasurable and interesting it is. It has kept me going in the past few years when I feel if I hear myself talk about Shakespeare’s message one more time I will cry. I will try to keep the spirit of ‘local effects of language, in the moment’ alive next term! Thank you.

    1. Thank you SO much for taking the time to write this, when you must be on your KNEES at this time of year… I’m so pleased that it’s been a useful and encouraging and stimulating thing. I despair at the ‘message’ and ‘intention’ GCSE (and A-level!) orthodoxy and am baffled by it – where has it come from?!
      (My new blog in the new year, on Two Gentlemen of Verona, will be a VERY different thing. One nice real dog, as opposed to all those mongrels Macb compares the murderers to!)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *