Polonius: this is your mission; Reynaldo: bye then; Polonius: not so fast (2.1.1-6) #InkyCloak #SlowShakespeare

Enter POLONIUS with his man [Reynaldo] or two.

POLONIUS      Give him this money and these notes, Reynaldo.

REYNALDO    I will, my lord.

POLONIUS      You shall do marvellous wisely, good Reynaldo,

Before you visit him to make inquire

Of his behaviour.

REYNALDO    My lord, I did intend it.

POLONIUS      Marry, well said, very well said.       (2.1.1-6)

A complete shift of tone and pace: daylight, interior, family matters. Back to Polonius, fussing. Give him this money and these notes, Reynaldo. He is not named; probably able to be inferred pretty quickly that it’s Laertes? In any case, Reynaldo’s being sent on a mission, with money and letters to deliver. He’s polite, efficient: I will, my lord: there might be a brief bow as he makes to leave, off to the airport, car waiting. But no, not yet. You shall do marvellous wisely, good Reynaldo, before you visit him to make inquire of his behaviour. It’d be a really good idea, before you actually meet up with him, to make discreet enquiries as to how he’s doing, ask around, find out what he’s up to—what people think of him, his reputation. My lord, I did intend it, says the obsequious Reynaldo—loyal long-time employee, he knows how Polonius operates, master of surveillance (he can be a sinister functionary, or else he knows that Polonius worries, that he’s losing his grip a bit?) Of course I was going to do that. Marry, well said, very well said. Oh good: this pleases Polonius, they’re on the same wave-length. But, again, Reynaldo’s not going to get away quite yet…

View 2 comments on “Polonius: this is your mission; Reynaldo: bye then; Polonius: not so fast (2.1.1-6) #InkyCloak #SlowShakespeare

  1. This scene does so many things! We just watched that powerful ghost scene and Hamlet promised to put on an antic disposition, and suddenly we are thrown into a weird domestic/political scene of a father sending a spy on his son. Just as I.3 with the inverted family triangle of Ophelia-Laertes-Polonius follows the I.2 family triangle of Hamlet-Gertrude-Claudius, this scene of father-(faraway) son follows the ghost father-son scene. How much should we trust the ghost when fathers seem not to trust the sons? The dialogue between the parallel plots is so complex and haunting.
    Another aspect that is suggestive is the time jump. How much time has elapsed between the previous scene and this one? The audience does not know yet, but there is already a sense that some time has gone by since Laertes left (sending money, asking Reynaldo to slyly inquire). The previous scene gave us a bombshell and instead of immediate revenge plot, we get this weird scene, setting up the themes of Hamlet so brilliantly. God, I love this play!

    1. it is indeed brilliant. I think in performance we probably don’t notice the time jump so much? it seems like things follow on fairly quickly – and of course Reynaldo could be imagined as being behind Laertes on the road, neither of them is going to get to Paris quickly (but I doubt an audience thinks that literally…)

Leave a Reply to Sunil Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *