Enter Montague – alone (5.3.208-215)

                        Enter MONTAGUE.

PRINCE           Come, Montague, for thou art early up

                        To see thy son and heir now early down.

MONTAGUE   Alas, my liege, my wife is dead tonight;

                        Grief of my son’s exile hath stopped her breath.

                        What further woe conspires against mine age?

PRINCE           Look and thou shalt see.

                        [Montague enters the tomb and returns.]

MONTAGUE   O thou untaught! what manners is in this,

                        To press before thy father to a grave? (5.3.208-215)

Connections. The first time we encountered Montague, back in 1.1, he was talking with Benvolio, early in the day, about how Romeo was getting up even earlier and mooching around feeling sorry for himself, coming home and shutting himself away in his room, because of Rosaline. Now Montague is up early too, as the Prince comments, but Romeo has again been earlier, early down, eluding his father, slipping away, not into his sulky teenage room, but this time where his father cannot follow him. Montague – unsurprisingly, given what he subsequently says – doesn’t seem to grasp what the Prince is (perhaps too obliquely, but very gently) telling him. That Romeo, his son, is dead. He is preoccupied with another tragedy: his wife has died of a broken heart, unable to cope even with Romeo’s banishment. (Lady Montague has apparently done exactly what Lady Capulet says she herself is going to do.) As editors point out, there will be straightforward reasons for this: the actor playing Lady Montague clearly has to double another part. But it gives Montague that noted of stunned pathos: just as the Capulets were mourning Tybalt, and then Juliet, and now Juliet again and are almost too overloaded with grief to be able to process it, so Montague is having to confront the almost simultaneous deaths of his wife and his son (and he thought that Romeo was safely out of the way, in Mantua). In the first quarto there is an additional line, spoken by Montague, saying that Benvolio is dead too. This might also be for doubling reasons; his absence is odd. I’ve suggested earlier on that the effective replacement of Benvolio with Balthasar as Romeo’s sidekick means that there’s no one to talk Romeo out of his desperate plan, because Balthasar is servant, not friend; it isolates Romeo, too. But there’s no reason why Benvolio can’t be a shattered, silent presence in the tomb scene, as in the current RSC production, where it’s poignantly effective. (Benvolio, as I observed absolutely ages ago, is a first sketch for Hamlet’s Horatio, the loving friend – perhaps in love with his friend, as again is the case in the current RSC version – who is left behind.) When Montague sees Romeo’s body – perhaps going into the tomb – or simply registering what he’s being told and looking more closely – his response is so gentle, and quietly devastating: what manners is in this, to press before thy father to a grave? Why have you died before me? And in fact it echoes Juliet, lovingly berating Romeo for not leaving her a friendly drop of the poison. In this moment, Montague is the most lonely character on the stage.

View 14 comments on “Enter Montague – alone (5.3.208-215)

    1. No? it’s the name of the family – Shakespeare’s anglicised version of the name in the Italian/French sources. Clan might be a word for it, rather than tribe? but I don’t think ‘tribe’ has helpful associations here.

  1. This is very helpful to myself as i have an exam in the morning and the analysis is great. Thanks whoever decided to go through with this for whatever reason god bless your soul. Bye now.

  2. hi hester!
    a bit random but are you looking into doing this for other shakespeare texts? i would love to hear what you thought about othello!

    1. Hi Ishwa, not doing Othello, sorry… You can find all of my blogs on my department webpage – currently in the middle of Hamlet! – but no plans to read Othello anytime soon (not because I don’t think it’s a great play! it is!) (Do I infer you’re doing A-level?? good luck if so!)

      1. nice to hear from you! i’ve just noticed that you covered richard II, and i think i’ll check it out! i’ve recently watched hamlet in the rsc which was honestly so mind-blowing and was definitely a bold concept for the play- on my to read list! yep i’ve been studying my a-levels currently and i really enjoy othello, even more than romeo and juliet which everyone in my class disagrees with! i really love the context behind the play and honestly i think thats why it really stands out to me. a-level is honestly really demanding (i wish i had listened to the year 12s prior) but the in-depth analysis really brings out more for the text! i was wondering if you had any pieces on othello because honestly i think engaging with other people perspectives on the text makes the process really enjoyable and i love how you break scenes up bit by bit. do you have any wider reading recommendations based on critics views of othello? also just in general- i would love to use a play for my nea but im not really sure as what could be deemed well for a critical essay, especially post 19th century.

        1. Hamlet’s an amazing play… (So is Othello.) Both so INTENSE. The RSC production was high concept but kind of spectacular! I haven’t got much in print on Othello… You might like Farah Karim-Cooper’s recent book The Great White Bard – which isn’t just on Othello but is a really thoughtful introduction to approaching issues to do with Shakespeare and race. Emma Smith’s This is Shakespeare is also a brilliant intro to lots of the plays, and she has lots of podcasts as well. You could ask your teachers if they’ve got the updated Arden Third Series edition of Othello; it’s been republished with a new introduction by Ayanna Thompson, and that’d be a really good way in to the play’s critical heritage, as well as more recent critical approaches. And, just for interest, seeing as you like plays… Toni Morrison (author of Beloved, etc) wrote a play called Desdemona… Good luck! (My top tip for Othello: think about it as a broken comedy, rather than as a tragedy – it’s a bit like R&J in that respect!)

          1. hi hester! just wanted to know what do you think of helena in ‘all’s well that ends well’- i’ve recently seen it and im dying to read others opinion on her!

          2. Oh she’s a funny one; interesting to have a female protagonist whom one feels sorry for but doesn’t much like! I’ve seen productions where she sort of knew she was being an idiot but couldn’t help herself (loving the ‘bright particular star’ when really Bertram is horrid). Clever and prickly and stuck – and very alone; she has the Countess, sort of, but she doesn’t have a friend or a companion (so it’s interesting in class terms, too). Weird play. Isabella in Measure for Measure is another one around the same date, intense and extreme and difficult to like.

  3. i agree! when reading the synopsis of the play i was quite excited- not often is it in a shakespeare play to have the main character a headstrong woman who pursuits her own love interest- but i felt like it was a bit icky in a way? i speculate that shakespeare took perhaps a typical storyline when writing the play but switched up the genders of the characters to perhaps be a form of social commentary but i feel like it doesn’t work too well? (if helena was a male protagonist and bertram was a female character as modern audiences it would not have felt any remorse for helena’s pursuit and would have thought it being quite overboard!) i do agree though when it comes to feeling sorry for, after all being a woman (and highly depend on herself) in rousillon looks rough, but i can’t help but feel bad for bertram? while yes, he is annoying and his lists of tasks to helena was quite unreasonable, i do understand why he is so adament and his rude behaviour to helena- his mother is a mother-figure to her which does establish their relationship as being sibling-like so i do think that’s quite interesting. i did find it interesting however seeing how helena does try to conform to society’s expectations of women but quickly gets an idea and all signs of passivity are gone! i do feel like bertram was a bit of a mudane character for her and so the marriage at the end doesn’t really make me cheer for her, even if she got her way. i’m a bit confused however, i see people online discussing ‘alls well that ends well’ as a comedy or a problem play and i’m not quite sure what i would catergorise it in.. i’ve also tried looking online if there were any feminist perspectives on helena as a character and how transgessive she is as a character but i can’t find much (‘alls well that ends well’ seems to be one of shakespeares lesser known plays) so i was wondering if you know of any good reading around the play? thank you 🙂

    1. These are great ideas! it’s quite a well-known story; Shakespeare (as ever) takes it from a popular source, but there are folktale elements too. It’s good for thinking about how gender and class intersect I think. I don’t think the problem with Bertram is just how he treats Helena, it’s also how he treats Diana? And I think that the marriage at the end definitely leaves a sour taste – does Helena even want it any more? I’ll do some digging for things that might be good to read, but that won’t be until next week; you’re right, it’s not written about so much as other plays, partly because it’s difficult to categorise (but categories are only ever a starting point anyway). Problem plays are plays about problems, is one way of thinking about it (and that’s a label that’s a modern one) – what sorts of problems might AWEW be about? (Are you thinking about studying English at university? you should consider it…)

      1. i actually didn’t consider looking into diana in more depth and accepted her as just a minor character- i need to look more into her! i feel like when coming to deciding whether helena’s marriage at the end was ultimately successful or not im quite split- i feel like helena in the end may feel as if she is successful in the moment since she essentially beats bertram’s impossible setbacks (i couldn’t help but think of her reaction after curing the king as well) i think that’s what intrigues me about helena; she views situations as just challenges and tries her best to resolve it- quite an honourable but also a bit ignorant response? i really appriciate you looking for materials for me (and still responding to my random comments- it means a lot!!) when considering AWEW i feel like shakespeare presents a scenerio where the patriachy shows it’s flaws and how illogical it is as a concept, but also does crticitises helenas impulsive approach into defying all measures, suggesting it to be perhaps not a logical move? (i’ve done some surface level reading on feminsim in the early 17th century and from what i’ve seen there had been an increase in literature and intellectual essays about feminism so i think i’m going to check it out in more detail!) when it comes to english literature as a subject i feel like im quite drawn to the analysising texts, the meaning and the context behind it but i don’t feel like i’m too (i’m not sure how to put this into words without sounding too lost so bear with me!) ‘dedicated’ to english? its quite odd because i also do economics and maths at alevel so from the start i’ve been quite split in terms of my own preferences and coming close to ucas dealines is a bit daunting! i am thinking of studying economics and politics as a dual degree or ppe, as pure economic degrees are really just leaning to being a maths degree and i feel like i wouldn’t be quite suited as it takes away the element of analysising/ understanding theorys? a part of me is still leaning towards doing liberal arts as an undergraduate degree (following one veryyy long meeting with my schools careers advisor) but i think ultimately economics (particulary macro) calls out my name haha. it’s weird because i do feel like i’m at a crossroads situation as most people my age wanting to do economics at uni are aspiring to work in the financial sector, but i can’t really see myself there i’m not sure why. i do find politics really interesting though, despite not studying it at a-level, as i feel like economics and poltics are so inter-linked and impact so many different factors in peoples day to day and honestly reading different case studies of impactful policies/ agreements implemented not just in the uk but worldwide makes me really excited so i feel like that’s where my heart lies (not saying that i don’t love literature and shakespeare- i really do! (although i did find it extremely difficult to like him at first when trying to understand why his work was so influential, when to me it was just archaic jargon))

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *