Theseus: people get confused in the dark! Hippolyta: yeah but, ALL of them, the SAME delusion? (5.1.18-27) #MoonMad #SlowShakespeare

THESEUS        Such tricks hath strong imagination

That if it would but apprehend some joy,

It comprehends some bringer of that joy;

Or in the night, imagining some fear,

How easy is a bush supposed a bear!

HIPPOLYTA   But all the story of the night told over,

And all their minds transfigured so together,

More witnesseth than fancy’s images

And grows to something of great constancy,

But howsoever strange and admirable.      (5.1.18-27)

Fantasies can take on a life of their own, suggests Theseus: such tricks hath strong imagination that if it would but apprehend some joy, it comprehends some bringer of that joy—this is a compliment to Hippolyta, it seems, and another expression of their apparently happy union. I’m happy, and it’s you that’s made me happy. Dreams can come true. Or in the night, imagining some fear, how easy is a bush supposed a bear! It’s easy to get confused in the dark, isn’t it, to get spooked by the most ordinary things? And to be frightened silly by something that turns out to be nothing? Theseus is speaking generally, and he’s not just speaking about dreams; Hippolyta, however, is still fascinated by the lovers’ story. But all the story of the night told over, and all their minds transfigured so together—that they’re all sharing the same delusion, at the same time?—that more witnesseth than fancy’s images and grows to something of great constancy, but howsoever strange and admirable. It’s the fact that they’re all telling the same story, that they seem to have undergone this wild experience together: that makes it more believable? Surely? I know it seems impossible but, in the circumstances, I think we have to believe their account of their crazy midsummer night, no matter how extraordinary and preposterous it seems!

View 4 comments on “Theseus: people get confused in the dark! Hippolyta: yeah but, ALL of them, the SAME delusion? (5.1.18-27) #MoonMad #SlowShakespeare

  1. I see Theseus as providing the perspective of cool reason and his two lines on joy as an argument of the atheists – chance rather than providence. Against this we have the cooly reasoned doubt of Hippolyta’s, that you’ve described, reason puzzling and threatening to undermine itself. To this, I think we can add the more radical undermining of reason, of Bottom’s ‘it bath no bottom’ and Puck’s, later, ‘no more yielding but a dream’.

    1. Enjoying your typo re Bottom…Mostly I think this is giving the lovers a bit of breathing space – but it’s also another proper conversation between Theseus and Hippolyta, and they’re not even talking about dogs this time! Oh, love and reason keep very little company together nowadays.

      1. Whilst the conversation has a function it is also a serious conversation. Instead of collective dreams they could be discussing ghosts, UFOs, visions of the Virgin Mary, or the Loch Ness monster, etc. Theseus provides a familiar rational explanation. Hippolyta retorts with the familiar ‘but how can you explain the collective nature of their experience?’

        We discover, shortly, they also stay in of an evening retelling bloody battles.

        1. some of the time, at least, but not all of the time… It does also have the effect of making the night’s magic temporarily recede, perhaps? just as the lovers described it? it’s something that’s being talked about, rather than experienced now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *